Home › CLAT PG › law › constitutional_law_advanced › 'Prospective overruling' as a constitutional tec…
'Prospective overruling' as a constitutional technique was introduced in India in
AA K Gopalan
BGolak Nath v State of Punjab (1967), where the Supreme Court held that earlier amendments to the Constitution would remain valid, but its new ruling would apply only prospectively
CManeka Gandhi
DIndira Sawhney
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: B. Golak Nath v State of Punjab (1967), where the Supreme Court held that earlier amendments to the Constitution would remain valid, but its new ruling would apply only prospectively
Golaknath imported the American technique of prospective overruling. Though Golaknath itself was overruled by Kesavananda, prospective overruling remains a tool used in subsequent constitutional decisions (e.g., I C Golak Nath, Mineral Area Development Authority 2024).
Related questions
Under the doctrine of 'pith and substance', if a law enacted by one legislature INCIDENTALArticle 311(2) provides that a civil servant cannot be dismissed, removed or reduced in raIn M C Mehta v Union of India (1986), the Supreme Court evolved the principle of 'absoluteUnder Article 13(2), any law made by the State 'in contravention' of the Fundamental RightS R Bommai v Union of India (1994) significantly curtailedWhich decision laid down that Article 21's 'procedure established by law' must be just, faDoctrine of 'colourable legislation' is BEST captured by the maximUnder Article 142, the Supreme Court has power to pass any order necessary for doing 'comp