alleryWhat is true about the cost of full inclusion?
AIt costs far less than special schools
BIt needs no extra teacher training
CIt does not reduce overall costs
DIt removes the need for extra funding
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: C. It does not reduce overall costs
1. Full inclusion was once hailed as cost saving, but it does not save money.
2. It needs a full set of services and resources, including training and funding.
3. So claims of low cost or no training are wrong.
_Source: Wikipedia, Inclusion (education), Principles and necessary resources_
Keep practising Unit 3C1: Learning Theory and Conceptual Understanding
Browse all Unit 3C1: Learning Theory and Conceptual Understanding questions for AP Psychology, or explore more Psychology topics.
Related questions
Under CCE, how many times a year was the three-hour written summative test held?In CBSE's CCE, two summative assessments together carried what weightage?In CBSE's CCE, what share of the aggregate came from formative tests?Under CBSE's CCE pattern, how many formative tests were held in a session?Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation in India was mandated by which law?Which is one of the UK Assessment Reform Group's principles of assessment for learning?How do teachers benefit from formative assessment?Which is a benefit of formative assessment for students?