Practice free →
HomeLLMLawInternational Law › In MILITARY AND PARAMILITARY ACTIVITIES IN AND A…

In MILITARY AND PARAMILITARY ACTIVITIES IN AND AGAINST NICARAGUA (Nicaragua v. USA), 1986 ICJ Rep 14, the ICJ held that:

Athe USA's mining of Nicaraguan ports and arming of contras did not violate international law (cf. Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States), 1986 ICJ Rep 14)
Bthe ICJ has no jurisdiction over use of force matters whatsoever (cf. Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States), 1986 ICJ Rep 14)
CNicaragua had no standing to bring proceedings in any international forum (cf. Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States), 1986 ICJ Rep 14)
Dthe USA's actions violated customary international law obligations of non-intervention, non-use of force, and respect for sovereignty
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: D. the USA's actions violated customary international law obligations of non-intervention, non-use of force, and respect for sovereignty
1. In Nicaragua v. USA (1986), the ICJ found that the USA had: (i) violated the customary law obligation NOT TO USE FORCE (by mining Nicaraguan ports and other direct attacks); (ii) violated the customary obligation NOT TO INTERVENE in the affairs of another State (by supporting the Contras); (iii) violated the customary obligation TO RESPECT THE SOVEREIGNTY OF OTHER STATES; (iv) the USA was not entitled to invoke collective self-defence (since Nicaragua had not been attacked by El Salvador). 2. The judgment is foundational on use of force, attribution, and customary international law. 3. Hence option B is correct. _Source: UN Charter 1945 / Vienna Convention on Law of Treaties 1969 / Geneva Conventions 1949 / ICJ Statute / UDHR ICCPR ICESCR — Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States), 1986 ICJ Rep 14_
Solve this in the app — LLM practice & 24k+ MCQs →
Related questions