In I. R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu, (2007) 2 SCC 1, the Supreme Court held that:
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: A.
1. Coelho settled that any law placed in the Ninth Schedule AFTER 24 April 1973 (the date of Kesavananda Bharati) is subject to the basic structure doctrine.
2. Such laws can be tested against the 'golden triangle' (Articles 14, 19 and 21).
3. The Ninth Schedule itself remains valid, but its protection is not absolute.
4. Hence option B is correct.
_Source: Constitution of India (Bare Act, updated to 105th Amendment Act 2021), Govt. of India Legislative Dept., I. R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu, (2007) 2 SCC 1_
Related questions
In National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) v. Union of India, (2014) 5 SCC 438, the SuprThe Constitution (103rd Amendment) Act, 2019 — providing 10 per cent reservation for EconoArticle 131 of the Constitution confers on the Supreme Court of India:Which case overruled the proposition in A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras, AIR 1950 SC 27 tArticles 280 (Finance Commission) and 281 (recommendations of the Finance Commission) beloThe Eleventh Schedule of the Constitution lists subjects that may be devolved by State LegArticles 243 to 243-O of the Constitution, inserted by the 73rd Amendment Act, 1992, deal The Sixth Schedule of the Constitution provides for the administration of tribal areas in