Article 13(2) renders void any law inconsistent with Fundamental Rights. The expression 'law' in Article 13(3)(a) does NOT include:
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: B.
1. Article 13(3)(a) defines 'law' inclusively: any Ordinance, order, bye-law, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usage having the force of law.
2. Article 13(4), inserted by the 24th Amendment, 1971, expressly excludes constitutional amendments under Article 368 from the scope of Article 13.
3. Kesavananda Bharati (1973) upheld 13(4) but subjected amendments to the basic structure test.
4. Hence a Constitutional Amendment is NOT a 'law' under 13(3)(a).
_Source: Constitution of India (Bare Act, updated to 105th Amendment Act 2021), Govt. of India Legislative Dept., Article 13(3)(a) read with Article 13(4); Kesavananda Bharati_
Related questions
In National Legal Services Authority (NALSA) v. Union of India, (2014) 5 SCC 438, the SuprThe Constitution (103rd Amendment) Act, 2019 — providing 10 per cent reservation for EconoArticle 131 of the Constitution confers on the Supreme Court of India:Which case overruled the proposition in A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras, AIR 1950 SC 27 tArticles 280 (Finance Commission) and 281 (recommendations of the Finance Commission) beloThe Eleventh Schedule of the Constitution lists subjects that may be devolved by State LegArticles 243 to 243-O of the Constitution, inserted by the 73rd Amendment Act, 1992, deal The Sixth Schedule of the Constitution provides for the administration of tribal areas in