Start learning →

MHT-CET Mathematical Logic — practice questions — page 2

Explore 57 free Mathematical Logic questions in MHT-CET Mathematics. Open each question or exercise to read its content, reference answers and available explanation.

Practise Mathematical Logic with Quill →

Mathematical Logic questions and exercises with answers

Showing questions 31–57 of 57.

The statement pattern p ∧ q is aRead the answer and worked solution →Two statement patterns are logically equivalent if theirRead the answer and worked solution →A statement pattern has 3 prime components. How many combinations of truth values are possible?Read the answer and worked solution →The symbols ∃ and ∀ are calledRead the answer and worked solution →The phrase "there exists" is called theRead the answer and worked solution →When does a 'for all' claim about a collection turn out false?Read the answer and worked solution →Take A = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7}. The claim 'some x in A has x – 4 = 3' isRead the answer and worked solution →The dual of the compound statement p ∨ q isRead the answer and worked solution →Interchanging ∧ and ∨ in (p ∧ q) ∨ r producesRead the answer and worked solution →Writing the dual of t ∨ p, we getRead the answer and worked solution →In forming a dual, the letters t and c areRead the answer and worked solution →The equivalences ~(p ∧ q) ≡ ~p ∨ ~q and ~(p ∨ q) ≡ ~p ∧ ~q are known asRead the answer and worked solution →To deny 'if p then q', we assertRead the answer and worked solution →Negate: 7 > 3 and 4 > 11. The result readsRead the answer and worked solution →The negation of "The number is neither odd nor a perfect square" isRead the answer and worked solution →Swapping the two parts of p → q givesRead the answer and worked solution →Negating both parts of p → q, in place, givesRead the answer and worked solution →If p is true and q is false, the converse q → p has truth valueRead the answer and worked solution →Which statement is logically equivalent to p → q?Read the answer and worked solution →Rewriting an implication p → q using only ~ and ∨ givesRead the answer and worked solution →Rewriting 'p if and only if q' using implications givesRead the answer and worked solution →Simplify p ∨ (p ∧ q) using absorption:Read the answer and worked solution →Joining any statement p with a tautology by 'or' always yieldsRead the answer and worked solution →Two switches wired one after another, in series, act likeRead the answer and worked solution →Two switches wired side by side, in parallel, act likeRead the answer and worked solution →In switching tests, the value 1 stands for a switch that isRead the answer and worked solution →The lamp in a parallel circuit of two switches is off only whenRead the answer and worked solution →

Worked practice questions

The statement pattern p ∧ q is a

  1. tautology
  2. contradiction
  3. dual pair
  4. contingency
Show answer and solution

Correct answer: D. contingency

It is true when both are true and false otherwise, so it is a contingency.

Open this question →

Two statement patterns are logically equivalent if their

  1. truth values match always
  2. symbols look identical
  3. letters are equal in number
  4. first rows agree fully
Show answer and solution

Correct answer: A. truth values match always

Equivalence means identical truth values for every combination of components.

Open this question →

A statement pattern has 3 prime components. How many combinations of truth values are possible?

  1. 6
  2. 9
  3. 12
  4. 8
Show answer and solution

Correct answer: D. 8

Each component is T or F, so 2 × 2 × 2 = 8 combinations arise.

Open this question →

How to practise

  1. Choose a Mathematical Logic question and try to work out your answer.
  2. Open the question to check the correct answer and read its worked solution.
  3. Continue in the app for bite-sized lessons, explanations and review with Quill. You can start without creating an account.

More Mathematics topics