LLM Arbitration and ADR Law — practice questions
51 free MCQs with worked solutions. Tap any question for the answer + explanation, or practice them all in the app.
Practice LLM Arbitration and ADR Law in the app →The ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996 was enacted to:Section 2(1)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 defines 'ARBITRATION' as:Section 2(1)(b) Arbitration Act 1996 defines 'ARBITRATION AGREEMENT' as:Section 8 Arbitration Act 1996 (POWER TO REFER PARTIES TO ARBITRATION) requires the COURT to:Section 9 Arbitration Act 1996 provides for INTERIM MEASURES by COURT:Section 11 Arbitration Act 1996 (APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS) where parties fail to agree:Section 12 Arbitration Act 1996 (GROUNDS FOR CHALLENGE) of arbitrators:Section 16 Arbitration Act 1996 articulates the KOMPETENZ-KOMPETENZ principle:Section 17 Arbitration Act 1996 (after 2015 amendment) confers POWER ON ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL to:Section 19 Arbitration Act 1996 provides that the arbitral tribunal shall NOT be BOUND BY:Section 23 Arbitration Act 1996 prescribes PERIOD for SUBMITTING STATEMENTS:Section 29A Arbitration Act 1996 (inserted by 2015 Amendment) imposes a TIME LIMIT for ARBITRAL AWARD:Section 31 Arbitration Act 1996 prescribes FORM AND CONTENT of AWARD:Section 34 Arbitration Act 1996 governs SETTING ASIDE of ARBITRAL AWARD:Section 35 Arbitration Act 1996 declares the AWARD as:Section 36 Arbitration Act 1996 (amended 2015 and 2019) provides for ENFORCEMENT of award:Sections 44-52 Arbitration Act 1996 deal with ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN AWARDS under the:CONCILIATION under Part III (Sections 61-81) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 is:The MEDIATION ACT 2023 was enacted by the Indian Parliament to:LOK ADALAT under the LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITIES ACT 1987 is:Section 89 Code of Civil Procedure 1908 mandates court to RECOMMEND ADR:In NHAI v PROGRESSIVE-MVR (JV), (2018) 14 SCC 688, the Supreme Court held:Section 5 Arbitration Act 1996 (EXTENT OF JUDICIAL INTERVENTION) limits court intervention:Section 31(7) Arbitration Act 1996 provides for INTEREST on awards:Section 33 Arbitration Act 1996 provides for CORRECTION AND INTERPRETATION of award:Section 7 Arbitration Act 1996 establishes the SEPARABILITY DOCTRINE (also embedded in Section 16):INSTITUTIONAL ARBITRATION versus AD HOC ARBITRATION:Section 12A of the COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT 2015 (inserted by 2018 Amendment) requires:Section 27 Arbitration Act 1996 provides for COURT ASSISTANCE in taking EVIDENCE:Section 34(5) Arbitration Act 1996 (added 2015) provides that a Section 34 application:Section 36(3) Arbitration Act 1996 (post-2015 amendment) provides for COURT to grant STAY on award enforcementBHATIA INTERNATIONAL v. BULK TRADING SA, (2002) 4 SCC 105 held that:Section 23(4) Arbitration Act 1996 (inserted by 2019 Amendment) requires COMPLETION OF PLEADINGS within:The 'PUBLIC POLICY' ground for SETTING ASIDE under Section 34(2)(b)(ii) Arbitration Act 1996 has been NARROWEDDELHI INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE (DIAC) was established by:UNCITRAL MODEL LAW ON INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION 1985 (revised 2006):NEW YORK CONVENTION 1958 on the RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARDS:INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION under BILATERAL INVESTMENT TREATIES (BITs) typically uses:MEDIATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT under Section 22 of the MEDIATION ACT 2023:Section 11(6A) Arbitration Act 1996 (inserted by 2015 Amendment) limits the scope of judicial inquiry at appoiSection 1(1) of the Mediation Act 2023 came into force on:SECTION 5 Arbitration Act 1996 provides the CARDINAL PRINCIPLE that:Section 37 Arbitration Act 1996 lists APPEALABLE ORDERS:Section 43 Arbitration Act 1996 (LIMITATION) provides that the period of LIMITATION ACT 1963 shall apply to arSection 21 Arbitration Act 1996 defines COMMENCEMENT OF ARBITRATION as:DOMESTIC ARBITRATION versus INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION:Section 38 Arbitration Act 1996 (DEPOSITS) requires parties to:INTERIM AWARD under Arbitration Act 1996:Section 39 Arbitration Act 1996 grants the arbitral tribunal LIEN on the:Section 28 Arbitration Act 1996 specifies APPLICABLE LAW:In SBP & Co. v. PATEL ENGINEERING LTD (2005) 8 SCC 618, the Supreme Court held that the JUDICIAL ROLE under Se