A recognised weakness of the direct method is:
AHeavy use of translation
BNeglect of speaking skills
CNo use of real objects
DLittle systematic written work
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: D. Little systematic written work
1. The direct method centres on oral training and the target language.
2. Its listed demerits include minimising systematic written work and reading activities.
3. It also needs trained teachers and is more time-consuming to prepare.
4. Heavy translation is the opposite of the method.
5. Speaking is its strength, not a weakness.
6. Real objects are used heavily, so that cannot be a weakness.
**Why the other options fail:**
- Heavy translation is what the method avoids.
- Neglect of speaking is the opposite of its strength.
- And it relies on real objects and pictures, so lacking them is wrong.
_Source: Wikipedia, "Direct method (education)", section "Demerits" (revision 1368030046)_
Keep practising Principles of Language Teaching
Browse all Principles of Language Teaching questions for CTET, or explore more Language I topics.
Related questions
Which method teaches concrete words with objects and grammar inductively?Prabhu said a task should draw on the learners':All successful language learning involves exposure to:The 1960s structural curriculum aimed at material that was:NCERT: the communicative method works best where teachers:Which feature do the direct and audio-lingual methods share?NCERT's test of acceptable English pronunciation is:In total immersion, the school day is spent in the learners':