Kohlberg found dilemma discussions raise a student's moral reasoning most when the partner reasons:
ATwo stages above
BOne stage below
COne stage above
DAt the same stage
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: C. One stage above
1. Kohlberg tested dilemma discussions in humanities and social studies classes.
2. Discussing moral dilemmas did raise students' moral reasoning.
3. The gain was greatest when the student talked with someone reasoning just one stage higher.
4. Reasoning far above one's own is hard to grasp.
5. Reasoning at or below one's own level gives no push upward.
6. So the best partner reasons one stage above.
**Why the other options fail:**
- Two stages above is too far to understand.
- One stage below and the same stage give no challenge, so they do not move the student up.
_Source: Wikipedia, "Lawrence Kohlberg", section "Moral education" (revision 1373893579)_
Keep practising Unit 3A2: Cognitive Development Theories (Piaget & Vygotsky)
Browse all Unit 3A2: Cognitive Development Theories (Piaget & Vygotsky) questions for AP Psychology, or explore more Psychology topics.
Related questions
Youth in the freedom struggle and youth today differ because development is shaped by:Plasticity in the life-span view means skills can be:Adults gain wisdom but lose running speed. This shows development is:In the life-span perspective, development takes place:Biological, cognitive and socio-emotional processes in development are:Changes in emotions, personality and relations with others are which processes?Thought, perception, attention and problem solving are which kind of process?Genes shaping height, weight and brain growth show which kind of process?