Home › ACSEE (Form 6) › Advanced Mathematics › Logic › Symbolised as $P\rightarrow Q,\;P\vee R,\;\sim Q…
Symbolised as $P\rightarrow Q,\;P\vee R,\;\sim Q\vdash R$, the argument about flowers and a birthday is:
Ainvalid, because it affirms the consequent
Binvalid, because the three premises contradict
Cvalid, by modus tollens then disjunctive syllogism
Dvalid, by repeated modus ponens on premise one
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: C. valid, by modus tollens then disjunctive syllogism
1. Premise one says a birthday implies flowers: $P\rightarrow Q$.
2. Premise three says no flowers were brought: $\sim Q$.
3. Modus tollens on those two gives $\sim P$ — it was not the birthday.
4. Premise two says $P\vee R$: either the birthday or waking late.
5. Disjunctive syllogism with $\sim P$ forces $R$, so the conclusion follows and the argument is valid.
_Source: NECTA ACSEE 2023 Advanced Mathematics 142/2, Question 2: Logic_
Related questions
A book club eats breakfast at one restaurant weekly and judges its dinners from that. TheiSomeone answers a philosophical claim by producing a case showing that the answer is wrongA philosopher notes that dialectics rely on logic and reason, while popular debates often An advertisement leans on fear or pity rather than reasons. That fallacy is an appeal to:Two events happen together, so a speaker declares one caused the other. That fallacy is:The whole point of that move is that the arguer diverts the attention of the:An arguer ignores the opponent's position completely and changes the subject. That fallacyAn arguer assumes the very conclusion he is trying to prove. That fallacy is: