The chapter's main critique of leaving social-justice goals entirely to free markets is that:
AMarkets always violate the principle of treating equals equally
BMarkets cannot ever provide a wider variety of consumer choices
CMarkets are biased against caste, religion and gender of buyers
DMarkets often work in favour of those who are already privileged
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: D. Markets often work in favour of those who are already privileged
§4.4 says free markets tend to favour the already-privileged and stay away from unprofitable regions, denying rather than extending opportunity for the poor. The other claims are not the chapter's argument.
Related questions
Informally, a person who seeks to avoid war is called a dove. What is the opposite?What is pacifism?Post-World War II Europe moved from economic integration to political unification. Which aThe first approach to peace manages competition among sovereign states through which arranWhich post-apartheid country is called a prominent political success story?Which country is named as a military dictatorship that uses force against its own people?Inspired by Gandhi, who fought anti-Black discrimination in the USA in the 1960s?How did Gandhi change the meaning of non-violence in a positive direction?