The chapter argues that the principle of 'equal treatment for equals' alone is insufficient because:
AIt conflicts with the constitutional guarantee of equal citizenship
BIt cannot reward differences in effort, skill or danger in different jobs
CIt violates the dharma tradition that kings should reward the virtuous
DIt would require absolute equality of income across all professions
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: B. It cannot reward differences in effort, skill or danger in different jobs
§4.1 (Proportionate Justice) says treating everyone identically would fail to reward different effort/skill/risk. A miner or policeman doing dangerous work deserves more than someone doing easier work.
Related questions
The chapter holds that disagreements about distribution and justice are:The chapter's main critique of leaving social-justice goals entirely to free markets is thThe chapter lists which of the following as basic minimum requirements for a healthy and pRawls' theory of justice is described in the chapter as compelling because it argues that:Rawls argues that, under the veil of ignorance, rational self-interest leads people to:John Rawls' 'veil of ignorance' asks people to design rules for society while NOT knowing:In the chapter, the principle of recognising special needs justifies which Indian constituImmanuel Kant's contribution, as the chapter presents it, refines Plato's idea of 'each pe