Home › CLAT (NLU Prep) › logicalreasoning › critical_reasoning_advanced › Passage: 'Section 32 of the Constitution permits…
Passage: 'Section 32 of the Constitution permits direct approach to the Supreme Court for enforcement of Fundamental Rights, and Dr Ambedkar called it the heart and soul of the Constitution. Article 226 grants similar but wider powers to the High Courts, including for non-fundamental rights.' Which is the BEST inference?
AThe Supreme Court has wider writ jurisdiction than the High Courts
BThe High Courts' writ jurisdiction is in some respects WIDER than the Supreme Court's, although Article 32 itself is a fundamental right (the Supreme Court route is a constitutional guarantee in a way Article 226 is not)
COnly the Supreme Court can issue writs
DArticle 32 is unimportant
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: B. The High Courts' writ jurisdiction is in some respects WIDER than the Supreme Court's, although Article 32 itself is a fundamental right (the Supreme Court route is a constitutional guarantee in a way Article 226 is not)
The passage distinguishes scope (Article 226 is wider in subject-matter) from status (Article 32 is itself a fundamental right). Both points are present in the passage; the inference must capture both correctly.
Related questions
Passage: 'Cities that adopted strict drug-related sentencing did NOT see lower rates of drPassage: 'Many universities introduced strict anti-plagiarism software in the last decade.Passage: 'Although thousands of small business owners receive government subsidies each yePassage: 'Despite higher GDP, surveys repeatedly find that average happiness in India has Passage: 'The Constitution does not expressly mention the right to privacy. In K S PuttaswPassage: 'Studies show that consumer behaviour is heavily influenced by which option is prPassage: 'India follows a federal structure with a unitary bias — the Union has the residuPassage: 'The number of new books published in India has doubled in the last decade. There