Home › CLAT (NLU Prep) › logicalreasoning › critical_reasoning_advanced › Passage: 'The Constitution does not expressly me…
Passage: 'The Constitution does not expressly mention the right to privacy. In K S Puttaswamy v Union of India (2017), a nine-judge bench unanimously held that the right to privacy is intrinsic to Article 21 and other Fundamental Rights.' The BEST inference is
AConstitutional rights need not be textually explicit to be Fundamental Rights; the Court reads them into Part III when they are intrinsic to dignity and liberty
BOnly Article 21 gives rights
COnly nine-judge benches can recognise rights
DPrivacy is no longer a right
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: A. Constitutional rights need not be textually explicit to be Fundamental Rights; the Court reads them into Part III when they are intrinsic to dignity and liberty
The passage illustrates judicial reading-in of implied rights. The inference generalises the principle: rights can be intrinsic without being explicit. The other options either contradict or narrow the passage.
Related questions
Passage: 'Cities that adopted strict drug-related sentencing did NOT see lower rates of drPassage: 'Many universities introduced strict anti-plagiarism software in the last decade.Passage: 'Although thousands of small business owners receive government subsidies each yePassage: 'Despite higher GDP, surveys repeatedly find that average happiness in India has Passage: 'Studies show that consumer behaviour is heavily influenced by which option is prPassage: 'India follows a federal structure with a unitary bias — the Union has the residuPassage: 'Section 32 of the Constitution permits direct approach to the Supreme Court for Passage: 'The number of new books published in India has doubled in the last decade. There