Home › CLAT PG › law › jurisprudence_constitutional_rights › Which is the BEST distinction between 'judicial …
Which is the BEST distinction between 'judicial review' and 'judicial activism' in Indian constitutional discourse?
AThey are synonymous and interchangeable
BJudicial review tests legislative/executive action against the Constitution; judicial activism describes a creative, expansive use of judicial power to advance rights or policy
CJudicial activism is the exclusive monopoly of the High Courts
DJudicial review is barred under the Indian Constitution
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: B. Judicial review tests legislative/executive action against the Constitution; judicial activism describes a creative, expansive use of judicial power to advance rights or policy
Judicial review is a structural function (Articles 13, 32, 226). Judicial activism is a STYLE — typified by PIL jurisprudence, expanded Article 21, continuing mandamus. Activism can occur within or beyond traditional review boundaries.
Related questions
Which of the following is NOT a writ that the Supreme Court can issue under Article 32?Which of the following BEST describes the protection given by Article 20(3) of the Indian In jurisprudence, the 'will theory' and 'interest theory' of rights are CHIEFLY associatedThe 'basic structure' identified in Indira Nehru Gandhi v Raj Narain (1975) prominently inIn Indian constitutional jurisprudence, the 'doctrine of severability' (Article 13) operatUnder Hart's 'rule of recognition', the validity of laws in a legal system is BEST said toWhich is the CORRECT formulation of the doctrine of 'eclipse' in Indian constitutional lawWhich proposition correctly describes the doctrine in I R Coelho v State of Tamil Nadu (20