alleryStart learning →Inspecting cloth, a buyer misses a visible tear. His claim fails as
Acloth is exempt by law
Bthe proviso on inspection
Conly sample sales count
Dthe seller was no maker
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: B. the proviso on inspection
A visible tear is a defect his examination ought to have revealed, so the proviso removes the implied condition.
Keep practising Sale of Goods — Conditions and Warranties
Browse all Sale of Goods — Conditions and Warranties questions for CA Foundation, or explore more Businesslaw topics.
Related questions
Section 14's implied terms give way if the contract showsWhich of these is an implied warranty under Section 14?Goods are seized for an undeclared third-party charge. The remedy isWhich section of the Sale of Goods Act 1930 deals with the implied undertaking as to titleRice bought by sample arrives poorer than the sample. The breach is ofIn a sample sale, goods must lack unmerchantable defects that areCan an express term cancel an implied term under the Act?After inspecting goods, a buyer has no claim for