A saves B's property from fire. A cannot claim compensation if
AA acted gratuitously
BB was unaware of the fire
CA is a stranger to B
Dthe property was insured
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: A. A acted gratuitously
Section 70 needs an intention not to act gratuitously, which is absent when the facts show A meant it as a favour.
Keep practising Contingent and Quasi Contracts
Browse all Contingent and Quasi Contracts questions for CA Foundation, or explore more Businesslaw topics.
Related questions
Which section gives compensation for failing to discharge an obligation resembling a contrWhich section binds one enjoying the benefit of a non-gratuitous act to compensate?The law of quasi-contract was generally used to enforceWhich was one of the common money counts within indebitatus assumpsit?Quantum meruit and unjust enrichment areA worker with an express contract fixing pay cannot abandon it and sue onIn contract law, quantum meruit refers to the reasonable value ofQuantum meruit is a Latin phrase meaning