Can a court repudiate a contract opposed to public policy even if it benefits all the parties?
AYes, courts are able to
BNo, courts cannot do so
COnly if one party objects
DOnly after a full year
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: A. Yes, courts are able to
Public policy protects the public rather than the parties, so mutual benefit does not save the contract.
Keep practising Consideration
Browse all Consideration questions for CA Foundation, or explore more Businesslaw topics.
Related questions
In Beswick v Beswick, what remedy was granted for a term benefiting a non-party?In which case did Cardozo hold that no privity is needed for a dangerous defective productWhich is a recognised common law exception to the privity rule?Mrs Donoghue could not sue under the contract for a bottle with a snail, so she sued the mWhich doctrine states a contract cannot confer rights or obligations on a non-party?Which international instrument expressly rejects the doctrine of consideration?A bonus clause in a contract rewards the contractor forB pays A $5,000 to hold a script exclusively for a year, with $50,000 more if B produces i