alleryStart learning →An agreement that unduly restricts the personal liberty of a party is
AValid if fully paid for
BVoid, against public policy
CEnforceable after a year
DValid among relatives
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: B. Void, against public policy
Undue restriction on personal liberty offends public policy, so the agreement is void.
Keep practising Consideration
Browse all Consideration questions for CA Foundation, or explore more Businesslaw topics.
Related questions
In Beswick v Beswick, what remedy was granted for a term benefiting a non-party?In which case did Cardozo hold that no privity is needed for a dangerous defective productWhich is a recognised common law exception to the privity rule?Mrs Donoghue could not sue under the contract for a bottle with a snail, so she sued the mWhich doctrine states a contract cannot confer rights or obligations on a non-party?Which international instrument expressly rejects the doctrine of consideration?A bonus clause in a contract rewards the contractor forB pays A $5,000 to hold a script exclusively for a year, with $50,000 more if B produces i