Home › CA Foundation › businesslaw › Other Essential Elements of a Contract › Which distinction between coercion and undue inf…
Which distinction between coercion and undue influence is correct?
ACoercion is mental pressure; undue influence is physical force
BCoercion may be exercised even by a stranger, whereas undue influence operates only between parties to the contract
CCoercion needs a special relationship; undue influence does not
DBoth must come from a party to the contract
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: B. Coercion may be exercised even by a stranger, whereas undue influence operates only between parties to the contract
Coercion need not proceed from a party and may be directed by or against a stranger; undue influence requires a relationship between the parties to the contract.
Related questions
Under Section 24, where one part of a single consideration for an object is unlawful and cA marriage brokerage agreement, i.e. a promise to pay reward for procuring a spouse, is:An agreement to assist another in litigation in exchange for a share of the proceeds of thAn agreement to stifle the prosecution of a non-compoundable offence is:Under Section 23, the consideration or object of an agreement is unlawful when it is:How does the law treat a mistake of Indian law versus a mistake of foreign law?Under Section 22, a contract is NOT voidable merely because:A bilateral mistake of both parties as to a matter of fact essential to the agreement (Sec