When consent is caused by bilateral mistake of fact as opposed to coercion, the agreement is respectively:
ABoth voidable
BBoth void
CVoidable and void
DVoid and voidable
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: D. Void and voidable
A contract whose consent is caused by coercion, undue influence, fraud or misrepresentation is voidable
one vitiated by a bilateral mistake of essential fact is void.
Keep practising Other Essential Elements of a Contract
Browse all Other Essential Elements of a Contract questions for CA Foundation, or explore more Businesslaw topics.
Related questions
Who is typically the perpetrator of undue influence?Undue influence is a process in which whose free will is supplanted?A reward for finishing a job early is a clause of what type?Without consideration, in common law, what follows for the contract?Which term refers to a nominal sum treated as sufficient consideration?In Pao On v Lau Yiu Long, what must be true of the past act?What is the chief difference between English and Indian consideration rules?Under English law, is moral consideration sufficient for a simple contract?