Home › CA Foundation › businesslaw › Nature of Contracts › A debt that can no longer be sued upon because t…
A debt that can no longer be sued upon because three years have lapsed under the Limitation Act gives rise to a contract that is best described as:
AVoid
BVoidable
CUnenforceable
DIllegal
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: C. Unenforceable
It is good in substance but barred by a technical defect (limitation), so it is an unenforceable contract rather than void, voidable or illegal.
Related questions
'Consensus ad idem', an essential of a valid agreement, means that the parties:Which statement correctly expresses the relationship between agreements and contracts?'A tells B that he desires to marry by the end of the year.' This is not a valid offer becSection 2(a) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 defines which of the following?An advertisement offering a reward to anyone who finds and returns a missing boy, once theWhere the consideration on both sides is a promise yet to be performed in the future, the In an 'executed' contract:A quasi-contract is best described as an obligation that: