Principle: Freedom of religion is subject to restrictions for public order, morality and health, and the State may act against social evils. Facts: The State bans a traditional practice that endangers human life. Decision:
AThe ban is valid only if all religions agree
BThe ban is invalid, as religious practices are absolute
CThe restriction is valid, as religious freedom does not protect practices harmful to life
DReligious freedom cannot be restricted on any ground
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: C. The restriction is valid, as religious freedom does not protect practices harmful to life
Religious freedom is subject to public order, morality and health, and the State may curb social evils; banning a life-endangering practice is a valid restriction.
Related questions
Which statement best distinguishes Fundamental Rights from Directive Principles of State PPrinciple: The Constitution permits the propagation of religion but does not protect conveWhich statement about the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) is correct?Facts: Women newsreaders above 45 are barred from presenting the news while men of the samPrinciple: No law shall declare an act an offence with retrospective effect (no ex-post-faPrinciple: Religious and linguistic minorities may establish and administer educational inFacts: An undertrial is kept in custody for decades while his case never comes up for hearFacts: To implement a Directive Principle, the government enacts a zamindari-abolition law