Principle: Freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a) is subject only to reasonable restrictions such as public order and morality. Facts: A filmmaker releases a documentary sharply criticising government policy. Decision:
AIt is protected expression, as criticism of policy is not a reasonable-restriction ground
BIt is valid only if the government approves the film
CIt is unlawful, as films are not covered by free speech
DIt is unlawful, since criticising the government disturbs public order
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: A. It is protected expression, as criticism of policy is not a reasonable-restriction ground
Mere criticism of government policy is core protected speech; 'dislike of the government' is not one of the reasonable-restriction grounds (public order, morality, security, etc.).
Related questions
Which statement best distinguishes Fundamental Rights from Directive Principles of State PPrinciple: The Constitution permits the propagation of religion but does not protect conveWhich statement about the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) is correct?Facts: Women newsreaders above 45 are barred from presenting the news while men of the samPrinciple: No law shall declare an act an offence with retrospective effect (no ex-post-faPrinciple: Religious and linguistic minorities may establish and administer educational inFacts: An undertrial is kept in custody for decades while his case never comes up for hearFacts: To implement a Directive Principle, the government enacts a zamindari-abolition law