Why is a primary source not always better than a secondary one?
AIt is never kept in archives
BIt is written only by scholars
CIt is always shorter and vaguer
DIt may contain bias or hidden views
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: D. It may contain bias or hidden views
A primary source is not necessarily more authoritative because it can carry bias and unconscious views.
Keep practising Primary Source
Browse all Primary Source questions for CTET, or explore more Social Studies Pedagogy topics.
Related questions
Per NCERT, social equality is best clarified through what?NCERT: gendering the curriculum means what?The NCERT paper wants history to include what?The social sciences position paper wants a school book to move from a closed box to what?The NCERT social science position paper says a prescribed book should be seen as what?Why can a documentary film be either a primary or a secondary source?Why are post-war World War I memoirs used with care?A first-hand account written long after an event is secondary in family history because of