alleryWhy is a history using only secondary sources weak?
AIt relies on too many diaries
BIt shows no original research
CIt cites too many archives
DIt is written in plain prose
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: B. It shows no original research
Citing only secondary sources does not indicate that original research has been done.
Keep practising Primary Source
Browse all Primary Source questions for CTET, or explore more Social Studies Pedagogy topics.
Related questions
Per NCERT, social equality is best clarified through what?NCERT: gendering the curriculum means what?The NCERT paper wants history to include what?The social sciences position paper wants a school book to move from a closed box to what?The NCERT social science position paper says a prescribed book should be seen as what?Why can a documentary film be either a primary or a secondary source?Why are post-war World War I memoirs used with care?A first-hand account written long after an event is secondary in family history because of