What weakened the case for keeping practicals in science evaluation?
AExcess time for experiments
BShortage of written papers
CSlackening rigour in practicals
DStrict external marking rules
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: C. Slackening rigour in practicals
1. The degeneration of rigour in practical examinations lent weight to the argument for removing them.
2. Practicals were then trivialised or dropped from teaching.
3. Excess time and strict marking are not the cause named.
_Source: NCERT Position Paper, National Focus Group on Teaching of Science, 6.3 Laboratory, Workshop and Library_
Keep practising Addressing Some Key Issues and Concerns
Browse all Addressing Some Key Issues and Concerns questions for CTET, or explore more Science Pedagogy topics.
Related questions
Rural students who study science in the local language face what barrier at +2?Where should guidance centres for rural science careers be set up?What programme is suggested to take science to rural children in vacations?Where should topics like food and water be set for rural pupils?Rural science learning is hindered mainly by a clear what?Most science learners in India are what kind of learners?What should go together in ensuring science education for all children?Which group is listed among those disadvantaged in learning science?