alleryWhat did Black and Wiliam's 1998 review find about formative learners?
AThey did much worse
BThey did about the same
CThey recalled much less
DThey did far better
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: D. They did far better
1. Black and Wiliam reviewed studies of formative teaching in 1998.
2. Pupils who learn formatively achieved significantly better than matched control groups with normal teaching.
3. So the claim of no gain or loss is wrong.
_Source: Wikipedia, Formative assessment, Evidence_
Keep practising Formative Assessment
Browse all Formative Assessment questions for CTET, or explore more Mathematics Pedagogy topics.
Related questions
In a five step method for creating a scoring rubric, what comes first?Which part of a scoring rubric gives a scale of values for each dimension?What is a rubric in education?Which rubric type evaluates the various dimensions of a work separately?Which rubric type gives one overall rating for a piece of work?In a mastery test, when does the examinee pass?Which other name is used for criterion-referenced tests by some agencies?What are most teacher-written school quizzes considered to be?