alleryWhich formal fallacy resembles modus ponens but swaps the second premise and conclusion?
AHypothetical syllogism
BDenying the premise
CLaw of detachment
DAffirming the consequent
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: D. Affirming the consequent
1. Modus ponens affirms the antecedent.
2. Swapping the second premise and conclusion affirms the consequent.
3. That form is invalid.
_Source: Wikipedia, Deductive reasoning, Fallacies_
Keep practising Mathematics
Browse all Mathematics questions for CTET, or explore more Mathematics Pedagogy topics.
Related questions
Which logical rule makes the move from "if P then Q" and "P" to "Q"?Where and when did maths teaching begin, by evidence?What is the fear or apprehension some students feel about their maths performance called?Which philosopher wrote in 1963 that induction is "a myth"?Roughly what is the chance of ten heads in ten tosses of a fair coin?Mathematical induction, despite its name, is a form of which reasoning?Which Scottish philosopher gave the classic critique of the problem of induction?Who first put forth eliminative induction, based on the variety of instances?