Whether a defendant could have predicted the harm resulting from an act is a question of:
AFavourability
BFeasibility
CFlexibility
DForeseeability
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: D. Foreseeability
1. Liability is not imposed for wholly unpredictable harm.
2. Courts ask what the defendant could have anticipated.
3. That question concerns foreseeability.
_Source: OpenStax Business Law I Essentials 2e, Chapter 6, The Tort System._
Keep practising Tort Law
Browse all Tort Law questions for LDC Bar Course, or explore more Law topics.