Start learning →

Whether a defendant could have predicted the harm resulting from an act is a question of:

AFavourability
BFeasibility
CFlexibility
DForeseeability
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: D. Foreseeability
1. Liability is not imposed for wholly unpredictable harm. 2. Courts ask what the defendant could have anticipated. 3. That question concerns foreseeability. _Source: OpenStax Business Law I Essentials 2e, Chapter 6, The Tort System._
Practise this question with Quill — LDC Bar Course →

Keep practising Tort Law

Browse all Tort Law questions for LDC Bar Course, or explore more Law topics.

Start a Tort Law lesson →
Related questions