A valid form using a conditional, affirming its antecedent to get the consequent, is called:
AModus operandi
BModus tollens
CModus ponens
DModus vivendi
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: C. Modus ponens
1. A conditional statement is used.
2. The if-part is affirmed.
3. It is modus ponens.
_Source: OpenStax Introduction to Philosophy, Chapter 5, Logic and Reasoning._
Related questions
A book club eats breakfast at one restaurant weekly and judges its dinners from that. TheiSomeone answers a philosophical claim by producing a case showing that the answer is wrongA philosopher notes that dialectics rely on logic and reason, while popular debates often An advertisement leans on fear or pity rather than reasons. That fallacy is an appeal to:Two events happen together, so a speaker declares one caused the other. That fallacy is:The whole point of that move is that the arguer diverts the attention of the:An arguer ignores the opponent's position completely and changes the subject. That fallacyAn arguer assumes the very conclusion he is trying to prove. That fallacy is: