Which option best corrects the sentence: "The damage done by the flood was worse than the fire"?
AThe damage done by the flood was worse than the fire did.
BThe damage done by the flood was worse than that of the fire.
CThe damage done by the flood was worse than the fire was.
DThe damage done by the flood was worse than from the fire.
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: B. The damage done by the flood was worse than that of the fire.
The original sentence compares "damage" with "the fire," which is illogical because unlike things are being compared. Option B compares damage with damage by using "that of the fire," making the comparison grammatically and logically valid.
Related questions
Close examination and explanation of a text, backed by reasoning and evidence, is:The rise and fall of stressed sounds within sentences is:A mask an author uses to cover their real self in a work is a:The meaning or thesis of a literary text is its:A sudden flash of intuitive understanding by a character is an:The moment of greatest intensity in a plot is the:A narrator who is part of the story is described as a:The vantage point from which a story is perceived and told is the: