Home › AP Microeconomics › Economics › Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly › Compared with a cartel, the Boeing and Airbus du…
Compared with a cartel, the Boeing and Airbus duopoly is held together by:
AA formal written deal
BA government price cap
CAn identical range
DA barrier to entry
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: D. A barrier to entry
1. A duopoly and a cartel are different things even when both involve few firms.
2. A cartel is a group of firms that have a formal agreement to collude.
3. The Boeing and Airbus case is explained differently.
4. The combination of economies of scale and market demand creates the barrier to entry which led to that oligopoly.
5. Structure rather than agreement is what keeps the number of firms small there.
_Source: OpenStax Principles of Microeconomics for AP(R) Courses 2e (CC BY 4.0), Ch 10 'Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly', sections 10.1-10.2_
Related questions
The prisoner's dilemma applies to oligopoly because firms face a choice between:Monopolistic competition and oligopoly are grouped together because both are:The kinked demand curve makes an oligopolist reluctant to raise price because rivals will:A cartel is unstable because each member firm has an incentive to:Products can be differentiated by physical features, location, intangible qualities and:A cartel agreement aims to produce which level of output?The barrier to entry behind the Boeing and Airbus oligopoly comes from economies of scale Analysing oligopoly pricing means weighing the pros and cons of competition against: