Home › GED › Social Science › American Federalism › Federal grants are often likened to a carrot. Wh…
Federal grants are often likened to a carrot. What does the comparison mean?
AGrants entice states to pursue national goals
BGrants punish states that break federal laws
CGrants must be repaid with interest over time
DGrants are reserved for farm states only
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: A. Grants entice states to pursue national goals
1. Grants transfer federal money to state and local governments and do not have to be repaid.
2. The carrot image captures enticement: a grant is designed to get the recipient to do something.
3. The stick in the pairing is the mandate, which compels rather than entices.
4. Repayment is exactly what grants do not require, so that option inverts their nature.
_Source: OpenStax American Government 3e (CC BY 4.0), Ch 3 "American Federalism", section 3.3 Intergovernmental Relationships_
Related questions
States sometimes compete for new businesses by cutting taxes and loosening regulations. WhThe Sixteenth Amendment, ratified in 1913, gave Congress the authority to do what?What makes a federal mandate an "unfunded" mandate?The writ of habeas corpus protects a person in custody by letting that person do what?Under Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution, which of these actions is a state forbiddWhich tax is the most important source of tax revenue for local governments?The National Minimum Drinking Age Act pressed states to raise the legal age for alcohol puIn the 2015 case Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court identified a constitutional right