In National Textile Workers' Union v. P.R. Ramakrishnan, (1983) 1 SCC 228, the Supreme Court held that:
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: C.
1. In National Textile Workers' Union v. P.R. Ramakrishnan (1983), the Supreme Court (per Bhagwati J.) recognised the WORKERS' LOCUS to be heard in a winding-up proceeding.
2. The Court reasoned that workers have a vital stake in the company's survival; their interests merit consideration alongside creditors and shareholders.
3. The principle has been carried forward in subsequent winding-up cases and into the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 framework (Section 30(2)(b) IBC mandates that workmen's dues be treated specifically).
4. The judgment is part of Indian corporate law's stakeholder-pluralism trajectory.
5. Hence option B is correct.
_Source: Companies Act 2013 (Act 18 of 2013), Govt. of India MCA — National Textile Workers' Union v. P.R. Ramakrishnan, (1983) 1 SCC 228_
Related questions
Under Section 2(46) and Section 2(87) Companies Act 2013, a 'holding company' is a companySection 271 Companies Act 2013 grounds for winding-up by NCLT do NOT include 'INABILITY TOUnder Section 102 Companies Act 2013, a statement (EXPLANATORY STATEMENT) annexed to the nUnder Section 246 Companies Act 2013 read with Section 339, the NCLT may order LIFTING OF Under Section 134(3)(c) Companies Act 2013, the BOARD'S REPORT shall include 'Extract of tProducer Companies are governed under Chapter XXI-A (Sections 378A-378ZU) inserted into thSection 380 Companies Act 2013 requires every FOREIGN COMPANY conducting business in IndiaSection 230(11) Companies Act 2013 (inserted by 2019 Amendment) deals with TAKEOVER OFFERS