Editorial: Over the past five years, city buses that installed interior security cameras recorded 40% fewer passenger altercations than buses without cameras. Therefore, installing security cameras on all remaining city buses will significantly improve transit safety across the municipal fleet. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the editorial's argument?
ABuses with cameras were specifically deployed on routes known historically for low passenger crime.
BSecurity cameras cost approximately $1,200 per vehicle to install and maintain.
CPassengers on camera-equipped buses reported feeling safer during evening commutes.
DTransit security officers review recorded camera footage only after an incident is reported.
ECity rail cars that installed cameras experienced a 30% reduction in passenger disputes.
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: A. Buses with cameras were specifically deployed on routes known historically for low passenger crime.
If the camera-equipped buses were assigned to routes that were ALREADY historically low-crime, then the cameras did not cause the 40% reduction; the route selection caused it. This selection bias fatally weakens the causal conclusion.
Keep practising Critical Reasoning
Browse all Critical Reasoning questions for GMAT, or explore more Verbal Reasoning topics.
Related questions
Medical Researcher: Patients receiving Drug Z for hypertension exhibited a 25% lower incidPaleontologist: Fossilized tooth wear patterns in ancient hominid species H show micro-strEconomist: Last year, Country Y eliminated tariffs on imported solar panels. In the subseqBotanist: Plant species X synthesizes high levels of toxic alkaloid compounds only when exMatch each boldface argument role with its structural function in the passage:Match each classical formal fallacy with its flawed reasoning pattern:Match each Critical Reasoning question stem with its required logical objective:Match each core element of an argumentative structure with its analytical definition: