Home › NEET UG › chemistry › c11vbt_hybridisation › Per NCERT §4.5.3 (orbital-overlap directional ar…
Per NCERT §4.5.3 (orbital-overlap directional argument), why does simple overlap of unhybridised C atomic orbitals FAIL to explain methane's 109.5° angle?
A2p orbitals point at random
BC has no 2p electrons
CThree 2p orbitals on C are mutually 90° apart, predicting 90° H-C-H — disagrees with observed 109.5°. Hybridisation resolves this.
DMethane is actually 90°
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: C. Three 2p orbitals on C are mutually 90° apart, predicting 90° H-C-H — disagrees with observed 109.5°. Hybridisation resolves this.
Per NCERT §4.5.3 + 4.6, pure 2p overlap gives 90° (perpendicular axes). Observed 109.5° demands sp³ hybrids that orient tetrahedrally.
Related questions
Per NCERT §4.6.3, why are the AXIAL P-Cl bonds in PCl₅ slightly LONGER (and weaker) than tPer NCERT §4.6.3, SF₆ uses what hybridisation, and gives what geometry?Per NCERT §4.6.3, PCl₅ uses what hybridisation, and gives what geometry?Per NCERT §4.6.2 (ethene C₂H₄), the C=C double bond consists of what, and each carbon's hyPer NCERT §4.6.2 (ethyne C₂H₂), the C-C triple bond is composed of which bonds, and the caPer NCERT §4.6.1, in sp³ hybridisation (e.g. CH₄), each hybrid has 25% s + 75% p characterPer NCERT §4.6.1, BCl₃ has its boron sp² hybridised. What is the molecular geometry + bondPer NCERT §4.6.1, in sp HYBRIDISATION (e.g. BeCl₂ in excited state), each hybrid orbital h