Principle: A person who finds goods belonging to another and takes them into his custody is subject to the same responsibilities as a bailee, and must take reasonable care of the goods. Facts: R finds an expensive watch in a public park. He takes it home and leaves it on the kitchen counter, where his pet dog chews and destroys it. Which proposition is MOST consistent with the principle?
AR has no responsibility because the watch was abandoned
BR, as finder, owed a duty to take reasonable care of the watch; leaving it where his dog could destroy it is a failure of that duty
CR is fully liable only if he intended to keep the watch
DR is liable only to the owner of the dog
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: B. R, as finder, owed a duty to take reasonable care of the watch; leaving it where his dog could destroy it is a failure of that duty
Section 71 Indian Contract Act treats a finder as a bailee. The duty is reasonable care, regardless of intent to keep. Leaving valuables where a dog can chew them is a clear breach of that duty.
Related questions
A person buys 3 books at Rs 240, Rs 320 and Rs 400. The average price per book is'If it rains, the match is cancelled. The match was not cancelled.' Which valid conclusionAll judges are lawyers. Some lawyers are not eloquent. Therefore,Identify the antonym of 'concur':Identify the word that means 'a person who breaks the law':Under the Constitution, the Comptroller and Auditor General of India is appointed byFundamental Duties of citizens are listed inDirective Principles of State Policy are