Section 107 IPC defines abetment as instigating, engaging in conspiracy to commit, or intentionally aiding. Section 108 explains 'abettor'. Liability for abetment is INDEPENDENT of
AWhether the principal offence was actually committed
BWhether the accused had a name
CWhether the offence was committed during the day
DWhether the accused had a permanent address
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: A. Whether the principal offence was actually committed
Per Explanation to s108, abetment is complete on the act of abetment; the principal offence need not be consummated. The abettor is liable for abetment even if the abetted offence does not occur — though punishment scales may differ.
Related questions
Section 90 IPC explains that consent given under fear or misconception is NOT consent. In Sec 300 'fourthly' criminalises an act done with knowledge that it is SO imminently dangerSection 96 to 106 (private defence) embeds a 'reasonable apprehension' standard. Which staIn Virsa Singh v State of Punjab (1958), the Supreme Court interpreted s300 'thirdly' (intUnder Indian criminal jurisprudence, 'mens rea' is sometimes excluded bySection 320 IPC enumerates 'grievous hurt' in eight categories. Which of the following is Exception 1 to Section 300 (grave and sudden provocation) is unavailable ifException 4 to Section 300 (sudden fight) reduces murder to culpable homicide not amountin