Home › CLAT (NLU Prep) › logicalreasoning › logical_reasoning › 'If it rained last night, the grass would be wet…
'If it rained last night, the grass would be wet. The grass is wet. Therefore, it rained last night.' This pattern is
ADenying the antecedent — invalid
BModus ponens — valid
CModus tollens — valid
DAffirming the consequent — invalid
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: D. Affirming the consequent — invalid
If P → Q, and we know Q, we cannot infer P. The grass could be wet from sprinklers, dew or a leak. This is affirming the consequent. Modus ponens (P→Q, P, ∴Q) and modus tollens (P→Q, ¬Q, ∴¬P) are the valid forms.
Related questions
Consider: 'Every student in the class scored above average. Therefore, the class average mIn the analogy 'Doctor : Hospital :: Judge : ____', the BEST completion isA speaker argues: 'My opponent claims we should reduce defence spending. So my opponent waConsider: 'No reptiles are warm-blooded. Some snakes are reptiles. Therefore, no snakes arA passage argues that mandatory voting should be introduced because 'democracy means rule Argument: 'God exists because the Bible says so, and the Bible is the word of God.'
This aPremise: Either the doors were locked, or someone heard the alarm. The doors were NOT lockPassage: 'The crime rate fell by 12% the year after the new law was passed. Hence the new