'If it rained last night, the grass would be wet. The grass is wet. Therefore, it rained last night.' This pattern is
ADenying the antecedent — invalid
BModus ponens — valid
CModus tollens — valid
DAffirming the consequent — invalid
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: D. Affirming the consequent — invalid
If P → Q, and we know Q, we cannot infer P. The grass could be wet from sprinklers, dew or a leak. This is affirming the consequent. Modus ponens (P→Q, P, ∴Q) and modus tollens (P→Q, ¬Q, ∴¬P) are the valid forms.
Related questions
Odd man out: APPLE, MANGO, BANANA, POTATOIn a series 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, ?, the next prime isIf A=1, B=2, C=3, ..., the value of PEN isOdd man out: 9, 16, 24, 36, 49, 64Find next: 1, 3, 6, 10, 15, ?Find next term: 8, 27, 64, 125, ?If the code for TEACHER is VGCEJGT, the code for STUDENT will beFind the missing term: 5, 9, 17, 33, 65, ?