A passage argues that ALL forms of social media reduce attention spans. The author cites a study of school students who used Instagram daily and showed reduced attention. The author's reasoning is MOST vulnerable to the criticism that it
AConfuses correlation with causation
BGeneralises from a single age group / platform to ALL social media
CUses an ambiguous definition of 'attention span'
DBoth (B) and the author additionally fails to consider a control group
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: D. Both (B) and the author additionally fails to consider a control group
The argument suffers from BOTH hasty generalisation (one demographic + one platform → all social media) AND lacks a comparison group to isolate causation. Both criticisms are warranted, so the combined option is most accurate.
Related questions
Odd man out: APPLE, MANGO, BANANA, POTATOIn a series 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, ?, the next prime isIf A=1, B=2, C=3, ..., the value of PEN isOdd man out: 9, 16, 24, 36, 49, 64Find next: 1, 3, 6, 10, 15, ?Find next term: 8, 27, 64, 125, ?If the code for TEACHER is VGCEJGT, the code for STUDENT will beFind the missing term: 5, 9, 17, 33, 65, ?