Per NCERT, the Indian Constitution allows REASONABLE RESTRICTIONS on Fundamental Rights. What is the key implication?
AFundamental Rights are absolute and cannot be restricted under any circumstance
BFundamental Rights can be restricted arbitrarily by any government order
CFundamental Rights are restricted only for non-citizens
DFundamental Rights are not absolute — they can be restricted on grounds like public order, morality, sovereignty, but only via reasonable + law-based limits
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: D. Fundamental Rights are not absolute — they can be restricted on grounds like public order, morality, sovereignty, but only via reasonable + law-based limits
Reasonable restrictions are constitutionally permitted but bounded (per NCERT). The other options misstate or extreme-ise the rule.
Related questions
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) was adopted by:The chapter's principle 'my rights are limited by the equal rights of others' implies thatWhich of the following is an example of a POLITICAL right rather than a civil liberty?The chapter argues that rights primarily place obligations upon:In India, the Constitution's rights are called:Immanuel Kant's moral argument for rights rests on the idea that human beings:According to the chapter, the difference between a wish and a right is that a right is:Per NCERT, what is the relationship between RIGHTS and DUTIES?