alleryStart learning →Under s.39(1), an officer of a company escapes liability if he proves what?
ACompany paid the fine
BHe had no knowledge
CHe was newly appointed
DOffence was minor
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: B. He had no knowledge
The proviso to s.39(1) protects him if the offence was without his knowledge or he exercised all due diligence.
Keep practising Foreign Contribution Regulation Act 2010
Browse all Foreign Contribution Regulation Act 2010 questions for CA Final, or explore more Law topics.
Related questions
Which power may the Centre NOT delegate by notification under s.47?Which offence cannot be compounded under s.41(1)?Whose previous sanction is needed before a court takes cognizance (s.40)?For s.39, a firm or trade union is treated how?What punishment does s.37 give for breaches with no separate penalty?Maximum imprisonment under s.35 for accepting foreign contribution in contravention of theMaximum jail term for knowingly giving false intimation under s.33?Which CPC rules apply to an appeal under s.31, as if from an original decree?