alleryStart learning →In an s.212 probe, whose prior approval suffices to examine other persons on oath?
AThe Registrar
BThe Special Court
CThe Tribunal
DDirector, SFIO
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: D. Director, SFIO
The proviso to s.217(4) says that for an investigation under s.212 the prior approval of the SFIO Director is sufficient.
Keep practising Inspection, Inquiry and Investigation
Browse all Inspection, Inquiry and Investigation questions for CA Final, or explore more Law topics.
Related questions
Giving an explanation known to be false during an investigation is punishable under s.229 Section 228 applies the inspection and investigation Chapter to which entities?Under s.227(b), a banker need not disclose affairs of whom?Section 227 lets a legal adviser withhold privileged communication except which detail?A company passes a special resolution for voluntary winding up. What is the effect on a s.Who first bears the expenses of an inspector's investigation under s.225(1)?If an inspector finds fraud gave undue benefit, the Government may apply to the Tribunal fOn an inspector's report, the Central Government may seek winding up on which ground under