alleryStart learning →If the effect of a policy change is not ascertainable, the fact
ANeed not be stated
BGoes to reserves
CShould be indicated
DIs shown as zero
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: C. Should be indicated
When the effect cannot be determined wholly or partly, the standard asks that this fact be indicated.
Keep practising AS 5 Net Profit or Loss for the Period, Prior Period Items and Changes in Accounting Policies
Browse all AS 5 Net Profit or Loss for the Period, Prior Period Items and Changes in Accounting Policies questions for CA Inter, or explore more Accounting topics.
Related questions
Bad debt provision is raised from Rs 20,000 to Rs 32,000 on new information. Extra charge Rent of Rs 25,000 for last year was omitted by error and received now. Other profit is Rs Profit Rs 8,00,000 before a Rs 20,000 prior period expense and Rs 1,50,000 extraordinary gLast year's stock was overstated Rs 15,000 by a sum error; bad debt estimate rose Rs 10,00Profit before a missed prior-year expense is Rs 3,00,000; the expense is Rs 30,000. Net prProfit from ordinary activities is Rs 5,00,000 and an extraordinary earthquake loss is Rs A Rs 90,000 machine, nil scrap, had 9 years straight line. After 3 years, total life is 12Last year's depreciation of Rs 40,000 was missed by oversight and charged now. It is