alleryStart learning →Which argument supports the capital approach?
AGrants act like a promoters contribution
BGrants should match the related costs
CTaxes are charges against income
DGrants are earned by meeting conditions
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: A. Grants act like a promoters contribution
Supporters say many grants are given against total investment and need no repayment, so they resemble capital contributed by promoters.
Keep practising AS 12 Accounting for Government Grants
Browse all AS 12 Accounting for Government Grants questions for CA Inter, or explore more Accounting topics.
Related questions
Rs 8 lakh grant on land, no obligations, deferred income method. Capital reserve credit?Rs 2 lakh asset grant, deferred income, 8-year life. Yearly P and L income?Capital reserve of Rs 25 lakh from a promoters grant; Rs 5 lakh refunded. Reserve left?Asset book value Rs 6.4 lakh rises by a Rs 2 lakh grant refund; 8 years remain, SLM. YearlRevenue grant refund Rs 2 lakh; unamortised deferred credit Rs 1.5 lakh. P and L charge?Rs 4 lakh revenue grant offsets training cost incurred evenly over 4 years. Yearly income?Rs 6 lakh land grant carries obligation costs charged evenly over 5 years. Yearly credit?Rs 3 lakh grant, 5-year asset, SLM. Deferred income balance after 2 years?