Home › AP US History › History › The War of Independence › Why were royal governors in the colonies often l…
Why were royal governors in the colonies often left powerless by the assemblies?
AThe assembly controlled the money they lived on
BThe King recalled them after a single year
CThe courts could remove them at any time
DParliament refused to confirm their orders
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: A. The assembly controlled the money they lived on
1. Colonial history is full of struggles between elected assemblies and governors appointed by the King.
2. As a rule a governor had no subsistence except what the assembly voted him.
3. That purse strings hold let the colonists render the royal governors powerless.
4. Governors were sometimes told to hand out offices and land grants to win influential colonists over.
5. Even so, colonial officials who took those rewards often went on espousing the popular cause.
_Source: An Outline of American History (U.S. Information Agency, 1990, public domain), section FRONTIER FOSTERS SELF-RELIANCE_
Related questions
Why did Britain judge the old colonial system inadequate once the fighting with France endBesides acknowledging independence, which territory did the peace settlement grant the 13 Burgoyne surrendered at Saratoga in October 1777. Which consequence made that the turning Parliament repealed the Stamp Act in 1766. Which pressure moved it to yield?Colonial lawyers accepted one kind of parliamentary tax in theory but called the other newWhich colony sent no delegate at all to the first Continental Congress in 1774?What did the Boston Port Bill do to the city of Boston?Which single duty did Parliament keep in 1770 when it repealed the Townshend duties?