In JUSTICE K.S. PUTTASWAMY v. UNION OF INDIA, (2017) 10 SCC 1, the Supreme Court held that the right to PRIVACY:

1. In Puttaswamy (2017), a 9-Judge Constitution Bench UNANIMOUSLY held that the right to privacy is a fundamental right under Articles 14, 19 and 21. 2. The decision overruled M.P. Sharma v Satish Chandra (1954) and the majority view in Kharak Singh v State of UP (1963). 3. The Court (per Chandrachud J.) identified privacy as: (i) bodily integrity; (ii) informational privacy; (iii) decisional autonomy; (iv) freedom from surveillance. 4. Subject to limitations: (a) legality (provided by law); (b) legitimate aim; (c) proportionality (necessary and proportionate). 5. Puttaswamy was the foundation for: NALSA on transgender rights; Navtej Singh Johar on Section 377; Joseph Shine on adultery; Aadhaar judgment. 6. Hence option B is correct. _Source: UDHR 1948 / ICCPR 1966 / ICESCR 1966 / CAT 1984 / CEDAW 1979 / CRC 1989 / PHRA 1993 / Constitution Part III — Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1_