Practice free →
HomeLLMLawInternational Law › The PERSISTENT OBJECTOR doctrine permits a State…

The PERSISTENT OBJECTOR doctrine permits a State that has CONSISTENTLY OBJECTED to a rule of customary international law during its formation to:

Aevade ALL international legal obligations whatsoever, regardless of source (cf. Persistent Objector Doctrine; Anglo-Norwegian Fisheries Case (1951); ILC Conclusion 15 (2018))
Bonly delay the application of the rule for 10 years from formation (cf. Persistent Objector Doctrine; Anglo-Norwegian Fisheries Case (1951); ILC Conclusion 15 (2018))
Cbe exempt only from treaty obligations but bound by custom (cf. Persistent Objector Doctrine; Anglo-Norwegian Fisheries Case (1951); ILC Conclusion 15 (2018))
DNOT BE BOUND by that customary rule, provided objection was clear, public and maintained throughout the rule's formation (but not against jus cogens)
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: D. NOT BE BOUND by that customary rule, provided objection was clear, public and maintained throughout the rule's formation (but not against jus cogens)
1. The PERSISTENT OBJECTOR rule: a State that has clearly and consistently objected to a rule of customary international law during the period of the rule's formation is NOT BOUND by that rule. 2. Recognized in Anglo-Norwegian Fisheries Case (UK v Norway), 1951 ICJ Rep 116 — Norway was not bound by the 10-mile bay rule because of consistent objection. 3. The ILC's Draft Conclusions on Identification of Customary International Law (2018) include Conclusion 15 on persistent objector. 4. NOT applicable to JUS COGENS norms — from which no derogation is permitted. 5. Hence option B is correct. _Source: UN Charter 1945 / Vienna Convention on Law of Treaties 1969 / ICJ Statute / ARSIWA 2001 — Persistent Objector Doctrine; Anglo-Norwegian Fisheries Case (1951); ILC Conclusion 15 (2018)_
Solve this in the app — LLM practice & 24k+ MCQs →
Related questions