Home › CS Executive › jurisprudence › Indian Evidence Act 1872 › Section 126 of the Indian Evidence Act deals wit…
Section 126 of the Indian Evidence Act deals with **professional communications between a legal adviser and a client**. According to the lesson, the protection extends to communications passing between them in professional confidence, AND continues unless:
A{'text': 'The legal adviser has died or has voluntarily retired from the practice of the legal profession for any reason whatsoever under any provision of any law in force in any State', 'label': 'A'}
B{'text': 'The legal adviser has been suspended or otherwise debarred from the practice of the legal profession for any reason whatsoever under any provision of any law in force in any State', 'label': 'B'}
C{'text': 'The communication was made through any third party of any description under any circumstance whatsoever under any provision of any law in force in any State of India', 'label': 'C'}
D{'text': 'The client gives express consent to the legal adviser to disclose the communication, since the rule is grounded in the impossibility of legal business without unreserved communication', 'label': 'D'}
Answer & Solution
Correct answer: D. {'text': 'The client gives express consent to the legal adviser to disclose the communication, since the rule is grounded in the impossibility of legal business without unreserved communication', 'label': 'D'}
1. Sections 126-129 protect **legal professional communications** from disclosure.
2. The lesson states: "A client cannot be compelled and a legal adviser cannot be allowed without the **express consent of his client** to disclose oral or documentary communications passing between them in professional confidence."
3. The rule is founded on the impossibility of conducting legal business without professional assistance and full and unreserved communication.
4. The privilege extends to interpreters, clerks and servants of the legal adviser under Section 128.
_Source: ICSI CS Executive Paper 1 — Jurisprudence, Interpretation & General Laws, Lesson 11 (Indian Evidence Act, 1872), pp. 251-272._
Related questions
Lesson 11 explains the difference between **confession and admission**. Which statement isAccording to the lesson, the distinction between **relevancy and admissibility** under theLesson 11 explains the distinction between **logical relevancy** and **legal relevancy**. Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act allows certain **statements by persons who cannot beLesson 11 lists **different kinds of estoppel** recognised in Indian law. Which set lists In *Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghosh*, (1930) 30 Cal. 530 PC, the Privy Council laid down aThe general rule of **estoppel** under Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act is based on Section 4 of the Indian Evidence Act distinguishes between **"may presume"**, **"shall pre